Client Collaborations

Represented local transit authority in condemnation trial for light rail station project. A petitioner’s verdict of more than $9 million less than owner’s just compensation evidence was awarded by the court. No fees or costs awarded to property owner. (Bench Trial)

Represented local transit authority in condemnation trial for light rail expansion project. Jury returned verdict that did not exceed the transit authority’s pretrial settlement offer and ultimately offset the just compensation award for a special benefits credit. No fees or costs awarded to property owner. (12-Person Jury Trial)

Represented local transit authority in condemnation trial for light rail station project. A just compensation award of more than $3 million less than owner’s just compensation evidence was awarded by the court. No fees or costs awarded to property owner. (Bench Trial)

Represented local transit authority in condemnation trial for light rail expansion project. A just compensation award for the same amount as petitioner’s valuation evidence was granted by the court. No fees or costs awarded to property owner. (Bench Trial)

Represented local transit authority in three-week condemnation trial for light rail expansion project. Jury returned verdict for nearly $1.5 million less than property owner’s just compensation evidence. (12-Person Jury Trial)

Represented local transit authority in multi-week condemnation trial for light rail expansion project. Jury returned verdict that did not exceed the transit authority’s pretrial settlement offer. No fees or costs awarded to property owner. (12-Person Jury Trial)

Represented local transit authority in multi-week condemnation trial for light rail expansion project. Jury returned verdict in less than two hours for an award that did not exceed the transit authority’s pretrial settlement offer. No fees or costs awarded to property owner. (12-Person Jury Trial)

Represented local transit authority in multi-week condemnation trial for commuter rail expansion project. Property owner argued just compensation of approximately $3 million whereas transit authority argued just compensation of $46,000. Jury verdict of $46,000. No fees or costs awarded to property owner. (12-Person Jury Trial)

Served as lead eminent domain counsel representing local fire district in condemnation action for fire station expansion project. Property owner argued just compensation of $450,000, whereas fire district argued just compensation of $275,000. Jury verdict of $283,000. No fees or costs awarded to property owner. (6-Person Jury Trial)